들뢰즈에게 어떤 윤리를 기대할 수 있는가?

What Ethics Could We Expect at Deleuze?

The moral based on the principle or the law is fictive and repressive? The principles and the law are theoretically fictive because they suppose and require something perfect, perpetually identical such as Idea, Subject or the Nature, and they are practically repressive because they are too far and too loose to be adapted to the life or each event of each person. How can we elaborate a new ethics that is veritable and non-restricting? To accomplish this mission, we examine the philosophy of Deleuze. This philosophy, defined as that of the <Difference>, refutes the notion of principle itself. So we propose that the critics of the subject in Deleuze should discover his ethics, which leads us to ask his <subject without identity>. The moment of the subject which can catch the Difference in itself is not the consciousness, which represents and identifies it, nor the unconscious, which conserves the difference only in the condition of being saved in the identical subject. We find at Deleuze the notion of the <impersonal consciousness> as the moment of the subject without identity, which captures the Difference in itself. A new ethics with this impersonal consciousness does not suppose any principle or law, but it is more rigorous than any other ethics, in that it demands us to see the truth of each singular event and to do something that exactly corresponds to this event and its sense. Ethics at Deleuze based on the concept of the Difference in itself can be elaborate with the notion of the impersonal consciousness and the singular truth of each event.