This essay explores some possibilities of comparing the politics of the ethics of psychoanalysis developed by Slavoj ？i？ek who is strongly affected by Jacques Lacan to the marxist theory of ideology. ？i？ek"s main concern is to separate subject from dominance of ideology. ？i？ek named his solution for subject"s emancipation from the Other “the ethics of the real.” As a Lacanian, ？i？ek paraphrases and reinterprets Lacan"s works from a vantage point with a focus on political contexts. ？i？ek finds that subject and the Other are commonly void and unaccessible by way of Hegelian concept of “negation of negation.”<BR> ？i？ek emphasizes the possibility of ‘the Real’, which enables the subject not to be completely enthralled to the Symbolic and make changes in it so that the real ethical aspects of the subject can be achieved. While ？i？ek"s theory can be an acute criticism to the right-wing intellectuals, it can also be a good lesson to the Marxist intellectuals in that his theory may help them to avoid totalitarian tendencies, and it can exert performative efficiency to subvert the existing Symbolic order.
1. ‘바보’와 ‘어릿광대’의 좌파이론을 넘어서기 위해<BR>2. 라캉을 경유한 헤겔 재인식: 텅 빈 주체의 공포<BR>3. 실재의 사막<BR>4. 지젝과 정신분석학: 그 딜레마의 양가성<BR>인용문헌<BR>Abstract<BR>
(0)
(0)