골프선수와 일반인의 등속성 근력에 관한 비교 연구

A comparative study of isokinetic muscular power and endurance between general people and golfers

&nbsp;&nbsp;The purpose of this study was to compare the isokinetic differences between general people and golfers. The subject of this study were two groups composed each one by 11 young(age 20 to 22) and healthy men (G1) and 11 experienced(5 years) golfers(G2). After the study we conclude as follow.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;1. Peak torque and peak torque% of concentric concentration<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;1) The increment of the maximum flexor power of right velocity difference of 60°/sec was more significant in G1 than in G2 (p＜.01) and the peak torque% difference was more significant in G1 than in G2 (p＜.05).<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;2) There was not a significant difference in the maximum extensor power and the maximum extensor power per weight.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;2. Angle of peak torque<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;1) The increment of the maximum flexor power of left velocity difference at 60°/sec was more significant in G1 than in G2 (p＜.05).<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;2) The angle of maximum extensor power did not show an significant difference.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;3. Peak torque ratio at antagonists between flexor and extensor<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;There was not a significant difference in the peak torque ratio at antagonists between flexor and extensor.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;4. Average power and average power% of concentric contraction<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;1) The average flexor power of right and left velocity at 60°/sec showed more significant difference in G1 than in G2 (p＜.01).<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;2) The average extensor power, the average power of flexor and extensor per weight did not show significant difference.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;5. Endurance ratio of concentric contraction<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;The endurance ratio of flexor of right velocity at 240°/sec showed more significant difference in G1 than in G2(p＜.01) and the endurance ratio of extensor did not show significant difference.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;6. Set total work of concentric contraction<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;The set total work of flexor and extensor did not show significant difference.