공시지가와 감정평가가격의 괴리수준에 관한 연구 - 감정평가 사례를 중심으로

A Study on the Gap between the Officially Assessed Land Prices and an Appraisal Value - Focused on the Property Appraisal Instances -

&nbsp;&nbsp;1. CONTENTS<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;(1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES <BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;We set goal of this study to make an analysis of the gap between an appraisal value and the officially assessed land prices through empirical datum. This study also analyzes that why this gap occurs and what a solution it is, and it offers practical or political point of view in connection with this current.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;(2) RESEARCH METHOD<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;This study selects 5cities and counties as sample regions, and it makes analysis of 2.818 of samples (this is the last 5years property appraisal samples) which are chosen on the basis of balance classified by purpose of appraisal. The process of analysis is calculating the gap (Classified by cities scale, a zone of use, a classification of land categories, purposes of appraisal, and years), a standard deviation, the maximum, and the minimum, and then making a statistical analysis of change and size of the gap, F-approval, and analysis of corelation. The result is as follows.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;(3) RESEARCH RESULTS<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;The result is as follows. First, the gap was revealed as managing regions ＞ agriculture and forestry regions ＞ the green belt zone ＞ residential areas ＞ commercial regions ＞ industrial regions according to a zone of use, and as forests and fields ＞ farms ＞ rice fields ＞ orchards ＞ site, and these results are similar as a hypothesis. On the other hand, the result was revealed as an appraisal for compensation ＞ an appraisal, and this result overthrew the hypothesis which was set up as an appraisal for auction ＞ an appraisal for compensation ＞ an appraisal for mortgage. This fact caused us to entertain strong misgivings that profits of development are not excluded from an appraisal for compensation. Second, the gap between an appraised value and the officially assessed land prices showed that the average of 5cities is 2.43times during 5years. This result also shows indirectly that the gap between provisions of the exiting law and actual works is on a serious level. Third, the gap is increasing annually. The reason why a degree of rising of real price is not reflected well in the officially assessed land prices. Fourth, there is a great difference between the maximum of the gap. This is means that the matter of balance of the officially assessed land prices of separate point are still in existence. Fifth, this study analyzed that the change of years, the difference of a zone of use, the difference of land classification, and others have a close connection with the gap between the officially assessed land prices and an appraised value. Sixth, this study analyzed through t-approval that fluctuation in prices of land usually have a positive correlation with the change of the gap.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;2. RESULTS<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;The above analysis and the result of this study present that what problems the system of the officially assessed land prices and the method of land appraisal have and that how we improve these problems. Therefore, this dissertation suggests reform measures on the basis of the result of analysis. They are as follows in short. First, the concept of a reasonable price which is prescribed as the exiting 「Law of public announced of land prices」 should be made clear. In other words, if the policy is determined to lead the officially assessed land prices and an appraised value of land to the current price, the concept should be built up as "Sein" price.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;Second, "The extra factors that influence to the land prices" was excessively stretched. Therefore, it is appropriate to introduce concepts such as "reflection of" other factors for supplement by purpose" or "reflection of other factors for supplement of normalization of prices." and the difference between the level of normal prices and the officially assessed land prices have to be reflected before complete actualization of the officially assessed land prices. Third, according to the r