김정한 문학에 나타난 식민 지배 정책 연구 - 희곡 「隣家誌」를 중심으로

A study of literature colonization rule policy appeared Kim Jung-han, Focused on dramatic 「Ingaji」

&nbsp;&nbsp;The play is primarily written to be performed. It should draw audience&quot;s attention and first of all, being a purpose play, it has to have some facts that instigate people at that point in time[Japan&quot;s 1910-1945 colonial rule of Korea], but Ingaji didn&quot;t fulfill the necessary conditions and of course, it couldn&quot;t be performed.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;It was the fact that there was a cause of discord in that book. Yosan speaking the reason why he gave up writing by himself, he didn&quot;t say anything about his books after 1940. But during that time, he wrote some books including Ingaji. That is the first cause that brings some misunderstandings, and secondly, Ingaji was published in Chunchu protected by Japan. In the third place, there are two sentences that arouse some disputes in Ingaji, because they make the whole context confused. The two sentences seem to be artificial and incoherent. When we find out characters&quot; personality and context flow, it can be also assumed that Ingaji has resistance awareness by using a roundabout writing skill otherwise.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;As a result, there are no elements that answered the colonial policies of Japan in Ingaji. It was focused on marriage problem between adolescentboys and girls and was a literary work that merely reflected writer&quot;s opinion in opposition to the colonial policies of Japan.