Two kinds of Buddhist practices (bh？van？) are known as principal ways to nibbana since early Buddhism: Calm (samatha) and insight (vipassan？) or concentration (sam？dhi, jh？na) and wisdom (pa？？？). Wisdom that means knowing things as they really are (yath？bh？tam ？？na) is based on the concentration. In the Therav？da tradition, There are two kind of practitioners: samathay？na which give priority to sam？dhi and vipassan？y？na which give priority to pa？？？ over sam？dhi.<BR> This study aims at clarifying the meaning of pure-insight (suddha-vipassan？) and its relationship of moment-concentration (khanika-sam？dhi) through the analysis of the relevant accounts of Pali Nik？yas and their commentaries (atthakathas) and Visuddhis-magga (Vism) of Buddhaghosa.<BR> Two kind of arahatship (arahatta) are found in the early Buddhist literatures: Arahat who liberated in both ways (ubhatobhagavimutto) and Arahat who liberated through wisdom (pa？？？vimutto). According to p？li commentaries, there are five kind of arahat who liberated through wisdom. The difference of these arahats due to what kind ofconcentration they depend on. Those are 4 kinds of material concentrations (4 r？pa jh？na) and momentary concentration (khanika-s？madhi). In these cases, arahat who depend on momentary concentration is called pure insight meditator (suddha-vipassaka or suddha-vipassany？nika).<BR> Arahats who liberated through wisdom (pa？？？vimutto) appear in the some early Nik？ya and Chinese ？gama literatures and also commentaries. In these arahats, we can find out there are pure insight meditators who can only depend on momentary concentration.<BR> Nowadays, Mahasi meditation method of Myanmar is a kind of pure insight, which can lead to arahatship.
Ⅰ. 서론<BR>Ⅱ. 본론<BR>Ⅲ. 결론<BR>English Summary<BR>
(0)
(0)