부파불교의 선정론 - 『청정도론』과 『구사론』을 중심으로

Theory of meditation of two Abhidharma traditions - Compare with Visuddhimagga and Abhidharmakoś a -

&nbsp;&nbsp;In this paper, I try to examine the meaning of concentration meditation(jh？na/dhy？na) of early Buddhism and compare the theories of meditation between therav？din and sarv？stiv？din. There are many terms which mean the concentration. Those might be sam？dhi, sam？patti, samatha, yoga, citta, adhicitta, bh？van？, vimokkha, vimokha, satipa？？h？na, anussati, sa？？？, etc. In these terms, the representative terms of concentration meditation might be jh？na, sam？dhi, sam？patti, samatha.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;There are some characteristics of the theory of meditation of the therav？din in the Visuddhimagga. One characteristic is theory of two kind of sam？dhi, access-concentration(upac？ra-sam？dhi) and absorption concentration(appana-sam？dhi). Insight meditation(vipassan？) can be practiced on any of these concentration because of overcoming of five hindrances(pa？ca-n？vara？a).<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;The sarv？siv？din theory of meditation in the Abhidharmako？a is different from therav？din in many ways, but some ideas are very similar. In this article, I try to explain that Not-reached state (an？gamya) of first concentration is functioned like access-concentra tion of Visuddhimagga, and enlightenment is possible based on these two kind of concentration as well as absorption concentrations. Pure-insight meditation(suddha-vipassanaa) is able to be practiced on the basis of access-concentration or Not-reached state of first concentration.