僧朗의 三論學과 師弟說에 대한 誤解와 眞實(Ⅰ)

Misunderstanding and truth about the San lun study of Seng-lang with the relations between master and disciple

&nbsp;&nbsp;Generally it is said that the famous buddhist monk Seng-lang(僧郞) came from Koguryeo, who had early learned the theories of Kumarajiva&quot;s system in the Northen China, and thereafter gone down to the Sou서 in the Sung(宋) and ch&quot;i(齊) periods.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;At that place Seng-lang played an important role in the San lun school, and the result described by Chi-tsang(吉藏) was summarized up as these three points.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;1. Seng-lang had teached the hermit Chou-Yong(周？) and Chou-yong later wrote &quot;San-tsung lun&quot;(三宗論).<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;2. Seng-lang refuted Ch&quot;eng-shih lun Master(成實論師) and reconstructed New San-lun.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;3. Under the influence of Seng-lang Liang Wu-di(梁武帝) the emperor of Liang dynasty threw away Ch&quot;eng-shih lun and wrote Mahay？na annotation.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;However these days some scholars doubt or deny the traditional records described by Chi-tsang. Such arguments may first came out from 境野黃洋 and the following scholars T&quot;and Yung T&quot;ung(湯用？)ㆍShunei Hirai(平井俊榮) also doubt the records. With one accord they argue that the three points described by Chi-tsang are no more than the exaggerating statement of Chi-tsang.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;But it seems to be rather misunderstanding than truthful. Therefore I put off argument against their opinion to the following chance, in stead regulating their arguments to bring into relief as to what are the main problems is recommended this time.