It is well-known that among the three kinds of the Platform Sutra, the Ton-ko-pen and the Te-i-pen have various difference in their contents. One of the main differences is concerning the position of Shen-hue who is a disciple of the sixth patriarch Hui-neng. His position in the Platform Sutra has been of crucial importance in the determination of dharma lineage in the ch"an school. But the Te-i-pen denied that Shen-hue succeeded to the dharma of hui-neng. In this paper, I examine why the editions are opposite in their estimation of Shen-hui, and demonstrate that the difference is related to the problem of establishing the orthodoxy of Lin-chi Ch"an sect.
Ⅰ. 머리말<BR>Ⅱ. 『壇經』編者에 관한 諸說<BR>Ⅲ. 法海批判과 認可方式의 변화<BR>Ⅳ. 神會批判과 禪思想史的 意味<BR>Ⅴ. 맺는 말<BR>영문초록<BR>「得異本『壇經』의 禪思想史的 意味」에 대한 논평<BR>
(0)
(0)