상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
학술저널

【제 2주제 발표】 : 창의성 검사의 문제점과 과제

The limitations and alternatives of psychometric approaches to creativity test

  • 281
커버이미지 없음

&nbsp;&nbsp;The purpose of this study is to review the problems of psychometric approaches of creativity test and to find alternatives to solve. Fist of all, because the approach Guilford and Torrance proposed, fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration as factors to measure creativity, have several problems related to measurement, this study pointed out and made critics about problems it has. Therefore, this study reviewed the history of psychometric approaches of creativity, approaches to do research on creativity, psycho-metric methods to measure creative processes, creative person, creative products, and creative environment as research areas for creativity. Then, the limitations of psychometric approaches for creativity test were reviewed.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;In conclusion, alternatives to solve these problems were proposed for future research.

Ⅰ. 문제제기<BR>Ⅱ. 창의성에 대한 심리측정학적 접근의 역사<BR>Ⅲ. 창의성 연구에 대한 접근<BR>Ⅳ. 창의성 검사의 영역<BR>Ⅴ. 창의성 검사의 심리측정학적 문제<BR>Ⅵ. 결론 : 창의성 검사의 과제<BR>참고문헌<BR>【제 2주제 토론 1】 : “창의성 검사의 문제점과 과제”에 대한 토론<BR>【제 2주제 토론 2】 : “창의성 검사의 문제점과 과제”에 대한 토론<BR>

(0)

(0)

로딩중