‘NP－에(서)/를’ 교체 구문의 분석

An Analysis on ‘NP-e(seo)/reul’ Substitution Sentence Structure

&nbsp;&nbsp;So far, this study examined structural property of sentences that substitutes accusative form of ‘NP-reul’ for locative form of ‘NP-e(seo)’. The results of the study are presented as follows：<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;First, verbs that substitute the ‘NP-e(seo)/reul’ were roughly classified into locomotion and non-locomotion. The former was classified into three types according to sub-semantic feature as follows：direction pointlocomotion verbs, simple motion locomotion verbs and deviative locomotion verbs. The latter was classified into dependent non-locomotion verbs and physical-effect non-locomotion verbs.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;Second, the verbs were classified into one place predicates and two place predicates according to selection of argument<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;Third, for the one place predicates, selection of locative case and accusative case is not syntactically necessary. Therefore, the ‘NP-e(seo)/reul’ in the one place predicates is an adjunct governed by Ⅴ&quot;, not a complement governed by Ⅴ.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;Fourth, two place predicates select ‘NP-e(seo)/reul’ as complement. The two place predicates include all the locomotion verbs including part of non-directive locomotion verbs, non-locomotion dependent verbs and physical-effect verbs.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;Fifth, the ‘NP-e(seo)/reul’ in two place predicates is parallel in that it is governed by V. However, a locative(e(seo)) is inherent case, it is assigned to D-structure and as accusative(reul) is a structural case, it is assigned to S-structure.