초록
When a insurance contract has been terminated for the future in accordance with the provisions of Articles 649, 650, 651 and 652 to 655, the insurer shall pay to the policyholder the surrender value(The Commercial Code §736). The surrender value of a life insurance contract has been defined as the cash value of a policy that has been surrendered to the insurer by a person having the contractual right to surrender it. One of the most frequently recurring questions in connection with the surrender value is that who has the right to surrender. According to The Commercial Code §736 that reflect a general rule, the person having this right is the policy owner, but this right can be transfer to the creditor who cancel the insurance contract after attach the insured" right against to the surrender value. An creditor may, in order to protect his claim, exercise the rights belonging to the debtor(The Civil Code §404(1)). But although the right to cancel the insurance contract is not a personal exclusive rights, to exercise the right of subrogation is not easy because §404(1) demand to fulfil the condition that the debtor in insolvency situation. The author agree with the court that in compulsory execution proceedings, the creditor" right to cancel the debtor"s insurance contract is allowed because if not the attachment is invalid. The Creditor of the insured has three ways to realize his claim, those are subrogation(The Civil Code §404(1), garnishee order(The Code of Civil Enforcement §223), assignment order(The Code of Civil Enforcement §231) or collection order(The Code of Civil Enforcement §232) on the debtor"s surrender value claim against to insurer. This result has arisen occasionally question with respect to the stability of the beneficiaries" expectation against the sum of insured. The author concluded that the new legislation was needed and those exception statute will be contribute to the harmonization of the interest between the creditorsand beneficiaries.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론<BR>Ⅱ. 제3채권자와 해지환급금의 법률관계<BR>Ⅲ. 결론<BR>참고 문헌<BR>〈Abstract〉<BR>
참고문헌 (0)
등록된 참고문헌 정보가 없습니다.
해당 권호 수록 논문 (14)
- 교회의 분열과 재산귀속에 관한 판례법리의 변천 - 대상판결 : 대법원 2006. 4. 20. 선고 2004다37775 전원합의체 판결
- 미국계약법의 구조와 이해
- 附錄
- 미국 불법행위 법리에서의 안전벨트 항변
- 미국계약법연구서설 - 그 구조와 현대적 의의
- 민법 제393조와 불법행위법에서의 예견가능성
- 의사의 설명의무에 관한 최근 판례의 동향과 그 비판적 고찰
- 해상화물운송장에 대한 법적고찰
- 意思表示의 主觀的 構成要素
- 해지환급금청구를 위한 제3채권자의 보험계약해지
- 저작인접권자의 공연권 도입 여부에 대한 고찰 - 음반제작자를 중심으로
- 영미법상 Consideration 법리와 계약의 쌍무성
- 착오규정의 개정시안에 따른 비정상적인 의사표시의 체계변화 및 농담으로 한 의사표시의 취급
- 民法 總則編 제5장(법률행위) 제1절(총칙)과 제2절(의사표시)에 관한 개정방향
추천 논문
-
김판기, 홍진희 한양법학회 한양법학 25(4) 2014.11
-
한병규 한국경영법률학회 경영법률 24(3) 2014.04
-
박인호 한국상사판례학회 상사판례연구 27(3) 2014.09
-
고형석 법학연구소 법학연구 30(1) 2022.01
최근이용논문
-
신학과사상학회 신학과사상학회 Catholic Theology and Thought Catholic Theology and Thought No.80 2018.06