무역계약의 해제와 손해배상에 관한 비교 연구
A Comparative Study on the Avoidance of Contract and the Damages in International Trade
- 한국국제상학회
- 국제상학
- 國際商學 第22卷 第2號
-
2007.063 - 18 (16 pages)
- 124
According to the result of considerations on the remedies for breach of contract by contracting parties in trade contract, which focus on the comparative analysis on the provisions of the private law-civil and Commercial code of Korea and Japan, the Uniform Commercial Code of U.S.A., the Sale of Goods Act, 1979 of U.K., the rules of each nation on the remedies for breach of contract turn out to have different provisions one another. In this aspect, the legislation of a uniform law on the international sale of goods has been required truly. After all United Nations Convention on the contracts for the international sale of goods was adopted in an international conference helded at Vienna of Austria finally.<BR> In these days, transactions of the merchandise and commodities of various origin are being carried out among the merchants of different nations and the world trade has recently been on the increase. In proportion to that, the conflicts of trade have been on the increase too. Therefore, the trade parties should try to make trade without conflicts smoothly. Consequently, when the breach of contract is placed among the parties, they should cope with it economically. The study of the every code of trade contracts of different nations is required.
Abstract<BR>Ⅰ. 서론<BR>Ⅱ. 무역계약 해제의 원인에 관한 주요국간 입법 시각의 비교<BR>Ⅲ. 무역계약 해제권의 행사와 효과에 관한 비교<BR>Ⅳ. 계약의 해제와 관련된 손해배상의 비교<BR>Ⅴ. 결론<BR>참고문헌<BR>
(0)
(0)