삼론가의 호칭과 승랑의 고유사상

On the Meaning of Various Names of Sān-lùn Masters and Seung-rang's Own Ideas

&nbsp;&nbsp;This is a preliminary study for establishing the philosophy of Seung-rang"s (僧朗) own. Go-gu-ryeo monk Seung-rang (450-530 C.E. circa) had great influence on the formation of East-Asian Buddhist Philosophy. Not only in the scriptures of S？n-l？n (三論) but also in those of Tia？n-ta？i (天台), Cha？n (禪) and Hua？-ya？n (華嚴), we can find strong influence of Seung-rang"s teaching. But it is not so easy to figure out the whole philosophy of Seung-rang, because there remains no scriptures written by him.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;Throughout J？-z？ng (吉藏)"s works we can find strong influences of Seung-rang"s teaching. Some of modern Korean scholars insisted that almost all of philosophies appeared in S？n-l？n treatises are derived from Seung-rang"s teaching. On the other hand some of Japanese and Chinese scholars criticized that J？-z？ng"s high evaluation on Seung-rang was a kind of fabrication. It would be not right to overestimate Seung-rang. But it would also be not right to underestimate him.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;To draw out the whole philosophy of Seung-rang, we should read carefully the treatises of J？-z？ng and Hu？-ju？n(慧均) and collect the sentences that express evidently the ideas of Seung-rang. J？-z？ng and Hu？-ju？n used various names to designate the advocators of S？n-l？n. Among the designations of S？n-l？n Masters, She？-l？ng-da-sh？ (攝嶺大師), She？-sha？n-da？-sh？ (攝山大師), Da？-la？ng-fa？-sh？ (大朗法師), La？ ng-da？-sh？ (朗大師) and Da？o-la？ng (道朗) mean Seung-rang. The ideas related with these designations can be included in Seung-rang"s own philosophy and contributions. Some of these are as follows.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;① Philosophy of non-attachment (無得)<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;② Not-offensiveness (無諍) toward the ideas of the other Buddhist sects<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;③ Interpretation of S？n-l？n with the framework of ‘Enlightenment of middle (中道)’ and ‘Teaching of illusion (假名)’<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;④ Composition of 8 volumes of Hwa-eom-eui-so (？？華嚴義疏？？)<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;⑤ He did not lecture on Mah？parinirv？？a-S？tra or Saddharmapu？？arika-S？tra.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;⑥ He lectured and made comments on Madhyamaka-？？stra.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;⑦ He taught Zho？u-yo？ng (周？) who was an able official of Q？ (齊) Dynasty and taught Wu？-d？ (武帝) who was a Emperor of Lia？ng (粱) Dynasty.