〈서울 1964년 겨울〉과 〈서울, 1986년 여름〉의 상호텍스트성

The Intertextuality in Seoul 1964 Winter and Seoul 1986 Summer

&nbsp;&nbsp;In this paper, I analyze the narration, the narrative structure and the recognition of the reality from the point of view of the intertextuality in Seoul 1964 Winter and Seoul 1986 Summer. The former develops what Kim sees and experiences from the point of view of his observer narration without any special narrator. He doesn&quot;t try the explanation of the situation but shows the lethargy and the oppression. It doesn&quot;t show any dramatic reversal caused by the conflict structure. With the simple and narrative structure from beginning to end, it is focused on the crisis resulted from the isolation and the loneliness throughout the amusing but deconstructive discourse. The main characters&quot; meaningless conversation causes the alienation and reflects the modern people&quot;s lethargy, the life without direction, the social feature to value the material and the indifference of modern society. They have the sense of emptiness of spiritual value caused by the materialism of the industrial society in 1960s, and try to avoid the oppression of the reality without the distinct purpose.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;Seoul 1986 Summer doesn&quot;t have suicide scene, which is different from Seoul 1964 Winter. People can find the former parodies the latter because of several similar things between two books. First, they have the same plot in which two main characters happen to meet and talk in a snack stall, go to inn together and say goodbye to each other next day. Second, they develop the simple story without any dramatic conflict. Third, they use the images related to “wriggle” and "appearance“. Fourth, they have similar conversation, situation and title. The writer of Seoul 1986 Spring narrates the character&quot;s ideal and emotion as an outward observer. It includes the close description, the narrative sentences, the sensible style, the unique nuance and many new vocabulary. Compared with the simple and plain structure in Seoul 1964 Winter, it has the narrative structure and various frameworks including teleportation, focus on description, overlap of the reality and the inside consciousness and change of the main character&quot;s personality.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;Today, the violence in the system incapacitates and weakens the modern people&quot;s power under the pretext of law, ideology and government power. The public accept it to secure the established right and be satisfied with the reality, instead of fighting against it. Dongsoo Kim who got accustomed to be lethargic, recognizes the subjecthood and faces the reality with the active attitude, after knowing the young man who embodies the value of humane life.