This paper critically reviews Manzini"s (1992) locality theory, which is an attempt to unify locality conditions for different types of dependency by introducing the notion of address. In order to extend her analysis of movement dependency to binding phenomena, Manzini (1992) assumes the so-called VP-internal subject hypothesis. In this paper, we will show that Manzini"s (1992) locality, which depends upon the notion of address, cannot be maintained if it sticks to the assumption of the VP-internal subject hypothesis. We will also show that V-T-I agreement is an alternative to the VP-internal subject hypothesis in Manzini"s (1992) unified locality theory.
1. Categorial Index Sequence and Address-Based Sequence<BR>2. Manzini"s (1992) Analysis of Wh-Islands and Tense Islands<BR>3. VP-internal Subject Hypothesis<BR>4. Problems with Manzini (1992)<BR>5. An Alternative: V-T-I Agreement<BR>6. Conclusion<BR>References<BR>
(0)
(0)