Лексичесние единицы, интернретирующие концепт “власть”

A vast array of accounts attempt to explain the nature of concepts. Also theories and methodologies and interpretation of meanings in linguistics and in a range of related disciplines, in order to provide a theoretical foundation for the corpus linguistic study of meaning in discourse. I describe the uses of the term discourse in linguistics to show different understandings of discourse analysis within our discipline. The term discourse shows a complex relationship inside linguisticsand different approaches postulate this relationship on different terms, as there are several ways to see how meaning is created in language use. Depending on the approach, the understanding of the term discourse determines the choice of linguistic principles to supplement discourse analysis. Therefore, further in this article I discuss the concept of discourse and discourse analysis within the theoretical framework of corpus linguistics to demonstrate how linguistics can contribute not only to the analysis of discourse on the level of the studies of lexis and syntax but also to discourse analysis aimed at the interpretation of lexical items in a particular context (i.e. studies where discourse of might is theorised as a complex relationship between language, ideology and society). In linguistics, abstract concepts are transformations of concrete concepts derived from embodied experience. The mechanism of transformation is structural mapping, in which properties of two or more source domains are selectively mapped onto a blended space. A common class of blends are metaphors. While the perspective is compatible with Jamesian pragmatism (above), the notion of the transformation of embodied concepts through structural mapping makes a distinct contribution to the problem of concept formation. The large group of examples demonstrate the different beings of concept might in Russian political discourse.