Norbert Elias became more famous after his death, whose books provoked philosophical, sociological and historical controversies. While Elias took notice of the civilizing process of humans, he tried to grasp the humanistic and social matters in a relational context beyond individual levels such as philosophical, psychological and sociological approaches. He paid attention to the correlation between an individual and a society which were not separated and couldn't be separated, and then developed penetrative thinking over the individuals and the social phenomena. Elias did not unfold educational discussion, but his books enriched the educational significance by dealing with learning matters that had been formed and obtained in the process of civilization by humans and societies. Especially the theory of Elias had a thread of connection with that of J. Dewey in terms of handing the suppression of democracy that had been developed in the civilizing process. Also, his theory had a thread of connection with that of M. Foucault in terms of handling the power struggles that had been developed in the process of cultural formation. Therefore, the work to create the theoretical framework that could identify the educational matters on the basis of Norbert Elias's theory of human science was important for the educational discussion, since it showed interests in the theoretical model that could observe the education and the learning phenomena. This study is to review the basic designs of the Elias's theory of human science, to discuss the formation theory, which is the core of the civilization theory, to describe the Elia's knowledge theory, and finally to draw educational significance of the Elias's theory.
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 엘리아스의 인간과학 연구방법
Ⅲ. 문명화, 결합태, 그리고 학습
Ⅳ. 지식과 학습
Ⅴ. 권력과 문명화된 학습
Ⅵ. 나가는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
(0)
(0)