'-아 있다' 구문의 통합 제약 현상에 대하여

On the verb constraints in ‘-eo issta’ constructions

'-eo-issta’ representing the function of resultative aspect, has constraints on the verbs which occur before it. It has been widely accepted that only the intransitive verbs vvhich has telicity as their aspcetual character, can occur as V1 in V1-eo-issta' constructions. We can call the verb constraint semantic, and the transitive verb constraint syntactic. But semantic ∞nstraint cannot be explained fully by telicity condition which demand V1 to be telic verb, Because there are many examples which telicity condition cannot explain. So some other argument were offered to elucidate the semantic constraints: existence condition, resultative condition， etc. But these arguments have defects, too. So I offered cognitive condition to explain the semantic constraints，For the explanation of syntactic constraints there have been several suggestions: existence codition ， '-eo iss-' syntagmatic constrain t， and dynamic condition. But they could not solve the problem of the syntactic constraints completely. So, in this paper I argued that thematic role can solve the problem ‘V1-eo-issta’ compositionally assigns ‘theme’ role to subject. Therefore in the transitive verb sentences object cannot be assigned thematic role, ‘theme’, because this thematic role is assigned to subject by‘V1-eo issta'. Assigning theme to object violates the thematic criterion. Therefore the ungrammaticality of transitive verb sentences is explained by thematic criterion.