The specific aim of the present study is to examine the articles of 『samkuk-yusa』 from the view-point of the organic relation. Many of these articles proved to overlap in contents. However, four articles of them showed similar contents from the others. Moreover, they contain some argumentative elements about the logical sequences of the description. The same illogicality is noticed in the descriptive style of the above-mentioned four articles, which suggests that the notes were added at the later periods. There is no doubt at least that those notes were written by plural scholars. These inconsistencies lead us to guess that the article of 寶壤梨木(boyang-imok) and others may have been added to the original book and re-compiled by some monks of the later periods.
1. 머리말
2. 條目間의 關係에 대한 用例分析
3. 本傳·本記와 條目과의 관계
4. 其他 指示的인 表現들
5. 결 론
(0)
(0)