日本에서의 韓.日條約 反對運動

Protests Against Korea-Japan Treaty of 1965 in Japan

This paper examines the movement against the Korea-Japan Treaty negotiations and it aims to discover people's history that was different from that of negotiators of the two countries. This task would work to understand the Japanese view of Korea(ns). A few previous studies about the same theme insist that protests in Japan were less active than those in Korea, or that Japanese had little interest in that matter. However, because they have treated only the Japan Socialist Party.the National Commission of Trade Unions and the Japan Communist Party, struggles by Koreans in Japan, or organizations promoting Korea-Japan friendship were dismissed. From that reason, by analysing the process and the leaders of those struggles, this paper will investigate the unique logic developed in Japan. The protest campaigns in Japan met the first peak from 1962 to 1963, when the movement somewhat inherited the success of the anti-Security Pact protests. But because of discord among the leaders and the Liberal Democratic Party's propaganda, the first peak deteriorated and stopped. The second peak came in lat 1965 when the Treaty awaited ratification. At that time, came in late 1965 when the Treaty awaited ratification. At that time, movement leaders could conduct together one of the most remarkable mass struggles since the anti-Security Pact protests. However, it is doubtful whether the mass fully accepted the explanation that Korea-Japan Treaty was related with the military alliance. From other aspects, on criticizing the Treaty, while the movement leaders provided the logic that the Treaty was caused by Japanese contempt or indifference about Koreans, it is also hard to judge the logic was influential to the mass. The Japan Socialist Party.the National Commission of Trade Unions and the Japan Communist Party had rival opinions on international situation and prospect of the peace movement. Their difference influenced the movement against the Korea-Japan Treaty. They united the protest against Vietnam War and economical struggles with the movement against the Treaty in order to mobilize the Japanese mass who were not aware of the importance of the matter. But that kind of struggle couldn't penetrate the essence of the movement. The Korean organizations in Japan, especially Korean, though it represented North Korea, worked to enlighten Japanese on the matter of compensation for the colonial rule and Korean's legal status in Japan. It used the indirect ways such as PR, statement and assembly not to provoke public opinion. The Japan-Korea Association and the Japan-Korea Institute criticized the Korea-Japan Treaty in context of promoting Korea-Japan Friendship. In particular they took notice on the Japanese view of Korea(ns), criticizing the movement against the Treaty itself. They concluded, in the process of the protests, that Japanese needed thorough criticism about colonialism or imperialism permeated into them. Japanese students and intellectuals could not develop active protests against the Korea-Japan Treaty while they struggled impressively in the anti-Security Treaty protests. It formed a striking contrast to struggles in Kroea during that time. The statement issued by intellectuals was only a declaration of conscience but it showed that Japan was responsible for the colonial rule of Korea.