6.4天安門사건의 始末과 실패배경

Research on Tiananmen Square protests of 1989

In the consequence of distresses had been accumulated since Chinese economy open policy adopted in 1976, the protest for democracy arose in June 4th of 1989. It is called as Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 as taking a opportunity of Hu Yaobang death, who had defined as a pro-liberal political leader during period of 1980's. It ended with a tragedy. The tragedy had been predicted from coredemonstrators in the knowledge, which the government was not plausible taking a flexible response upon the protest which the government has a very rigid policy against agitations. They pre-knowledged Chinese government has a strong infrastructure based on the peculiar cultural and political tradition since Han dynasty. Chinese supreme authority couldn't find a decent way to release the controversial： the sheer protest demanding open and democratic policy not for the rebellious one. However, there are several causes that democratic movement couldn't avoid the disastrous end. First, leading-demonstrators didn't cognize government structuremonolithic political system and the bureaucratical tradition in that moment. Secondly, it was a provocation against the supreme authority had been represented under one party autocratic policy. Add to above, anarchical characteristics of the movement was seemed to inflict the unification of China regarding as a prior concept of the government and majority of the people of China. If protester request for reforming the policy rather than cling into the personal impeachment considered as the constitutional threat, they might had obtain the path of government reform for democracy. In bringing up the personal impeachment against supreme authority assumed as one of their strategy the core might acknowledged to receive fatal consequence. Even admitting Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 revealed as a most tragedy contained other distracting causes, there are many optimistic factors about open- policy in the processing that no one could devaluate the patriotic motivation of the movement. With Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 as a momentum for protesters, they apparently realized their society more accurate in the point of time and gained more extensive foresight of China as being a substance with long duration of it's own historical bearing from various disturbances. Furthermore, they recognised their capacity for the future and defects of their own strategy. In these sense, Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 gave them vivid lessons allow to keep their noble and firm belief for future process and operations. Since the tragic moment, vast majority of Chinese has provoked into deliberating the subjects of Democracy, Freedom, and human rights with mature thought and contemplation, the same subjects had been buried in Chinese from 5.4 movement. Meanwhile, Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 brought a considerable turning point for the political leaders, so they enable making true efforts to recognize what people want the most, to find defects upon political structure and eventually willing to reform their policy as people of China should be respected and protected in their freedom and human rights as much as taking responsibility for the country. In addition, Chinese supreme policy against 6.4 demonstration and the following execution displayed strong prohibition further inflicting and mal policy to Chinese authority among Chinese co-related states which is Hong kong, Taiwan, so on.