한국 사료에 나타난 고구려사 인식

Views on the History of Kokuryo represented in Korean Historical Materials

In recent times, Chinese historians insist that history of Kokuryo is included in Chinese history. So at this time it is need to reexamine opinions of Chinese historians. This paper is to aimed at to examine views on the history of Kokuryo represented in Korean historical materials. At first I tried to find the self cognitions of Kokuryo peoples. So I suggest that peoples of Kokuryo regarded ed himselves as sacred state or center of the world. After the unification of three kingdoms, Silla regarded Kokuryo as a part of their country. But there was the other views, which regared Kokuryo as ancestor of Palhae. So it can concluded that views of Kokuryo was confused. In Koryo dynasty, it is certain that history of Kokuryo is a very important part of Korean history. But there was also confusion, where Kokuryo was build. In Chosun dynasty, there were conflict which had the legitimacy of history among three kingdoms. But views that Kokuryo is a very important part of Korean history were not suspect. So I can conclude that there were no evidence that conflict on the legitimacy of history among three kingdoms. But there was no evidence that invest history of chinese.