This paper aims at revealing the nature of counterweight in the pseudoclefts by reanalyzing the connectivity and anti-connectivity effects from a new perspective. I basically follow den Dikken et al’s (2000) QAP account that pseudoclefts are Question and Answer pairs and that there is deletion in the counterweight position. But I depart from their account by assuming that the relevant deletion is a constituent deletion which applies after the focus movement of the focused phrase to the counterweight initial position. It will be shown that this idea can successfully accommodate the anti-connectivity effects as well as connectivity effects and can extend to the explanation of the new sets of data in pseudoclefts.
1. Introduction
2. QAP analysis and its problems
3. Fragment answers in pseudoclefts
4. A problem - NPI connectivity
References
(0)
(0)