Hartman (2011) argues that head movement takes place in the narrow syntax (contra Chomsky 2000, Boeckx and Stjepanović 2001). His argument comes from the interaction of T-to-C movement and the MaxElide effect in ellipsis. However, Hartman leaves certain sets of data unresolved as a puzzle. This paper attempts to resolve the puzzle and argues that what has not been considered in the puzzle is a Parallelism requirement (in the sense of Fox and Lasnik 2003). The Parallelism considerations will in tum lead us to present some other important problems and issues, and I suggest that these are the real puzzles to be resolved.
1. Introduction
2. Hartman (2011)
3. Hartman’s (2011) Puzzle
4. Towards a Solution
5. Remaining Issues and the Real Puzzle
References
(0)
(0)