결과에 대한 지식의 상대적 빈도와 지연간격 유형이 운동학습에 미치는 영향 비교

A Study Comparing the Effects of Types of Relative Frequency and Delay Interval of Knowledge of Results on Motor Learning

Several studies have evaluated the effects of types of relative frequency and delay interval of knowledge of results(KR) on motor skill learning independently. The purpose of this study was to determine more effective types of KR relative frequency and KR delay interval for motor leaning. Forty-six healthy subjects (15 female, 31 male) with no previous experience with this experiment participated. The subjects ranged in age from 20 to 29 years (mean=23.9, SD=0.474). All subjects were assigned to one of four groups: a high-instant group a high-delay group, a low-instant group, and a low-delay group. During the acquisition phase, subjects practiced movements to a target (400 ㎜) with either a high (83%) or low (33%) KR relative frequency, and with either an instantaneous or delayed (after 8s) KR. Four groups were evaluated on retention (after 3min and 24hr) and transfer (450 ㎜) tests. The major findings were as follows: (1) there were no between-group differences in acquisition and short-term retention (P>0.05), (2) a low (33%) KR relative frequency during practice was as effective for learning as measured by both long-term retention and transfer tests, compared with high (83%) KR practice conditions (P<0.05), (3) delayed (8s) KR enhanced teaming as measured by both long-term retention and transfer tests, compared with instantaneous KR practice conditions (P<0.05), and (4) there were no interactions between KR relative frequency and KR delay interval during acquisition, retention, and transfer phases. The results suggest that relatively less frequent and delayed KR are more effective types for motor learning than more frequent and instantaneous KR.