상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
학술저널

국가행위이론의 다의성과 미국의 국가행위이론

Review on the Act of the State Doctrine in the United States

  • 185
111228.jpg

The act of state doctrine is derived from two statements by the Supreme Court of the United States. In Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897), the Supreme Court said, “Every sovereign State is bound to respect the independence of every other sovereign State, and the courts of one country will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory. Redress of grievances by reason of such acts must be obtained through the means open to be availed of by sovereign powers as between themselves.” In Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 428, the Supreme Court held that “the Judicial Branch will not examine the validity of a taking of property within its own territory by a foreign sovereign government.” This is to deal with the question as follows: “Are those two cases the same or should they be distinguished each other?”

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. 국가행위이론의 유형

Ⅲ. 미국 국가행위이론의 원칙과 예외

Ⅳ. 비교 분석과 평가를 통한 미국 국가행위이론의 재구성

V. 결 론

참고문헌

Abstract

(0)

(0)

로딩중