교정단계에서의 회복적 사법의 실현

A Study on the Realization of Restorative Justice in Corrections

With the many conflicting correctional goals such as deterrence, retribution, incapacitation and rehabilitation, the development of a unified correctional philosophy or approach to punishment is highly unlikely. An ideology can not be a chameleon, but correctional ideology can not give up any kinds of correctional goals. If we could not give up colors of correctional goals, we would make a mosaic. Restorative justice as a correctional ideology has three important faces; retributive accountability, rehabilitative healing and deterrent crime prevention. So this study challenges the possibility of restorative justice as a correctional ideology. Because proponents of restorative justice are not unified behind any one of these approaches, it can be used for very different purposes. And the diverse practice of restorative justice is operated using various functions from each area of criminal justice. But the ultimate purpose of each field of criminal justice is to achieve the concept of restorative justice. Now it is time to consider the practice of restorative correction in detail. So this study suggests four restorative justice techniques with correctional implications. The primary concerns presented are three fold; to operate the training program for understanding the principle of restorative correction by transforming the conception of the organization and the system of administration for correction, to lead the development of a training program for correction by the organization of correction, and to reestablish the system of administration for correction. And Revamping the probation and parole with a restorative focus is suggested. The introduction of VOP(Victim-Offender Penals), which is considered as the most proper program for correctional restorative justice, is suggested. Lastly, the establishment of a third organization for restorative correction program is proposed.