상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
학술저널

New Horizons in Enclosure Studies: Parliamentary Enclosure, Common Right, and 'Open' and 'Close' Parishes in Britain, 1700-1850

  • 7
112285.jpg

The first charge on the labourers' ten shillings was house rent. Most of the cottages belonged to small tradesmen in the market town and the weekly rents ranged from one shilling to half a crown. Some labourers in other villages worked on farms or estates where they had their cottages rent free, for 'Stands to Reason,' they said, 'they've allus got to do just what they be told, or out they goes, neck and crop, bag and baggage.' A shilling, or even two shillings a week, they felt, was not too much to pay for the freedom to live and vote as they liked and to go to church or chapel or neither as they preferred.

Abstract

1. INTRODUCTION: CONSENSUS AND CONTROVERSY

2. PARLIAMENTARY ENCLOSURE, EFFICIENCY GAINS AND LANDHOLDING STRUCTURE

3. FROM OPEN-FIELD ARABLE TO COMMON WASTE

4. FACT OR FICTION?: THE ISSUE OF 'OPEN' AND 'CLOSE' PARISHES

5. A CASE STUDY: PARLIAMENTARY ENCLOSURE AND 'OPEN' AND 'CLOSE' PARISHES IN OXFORDSHIRE

6. CONCLUSION

REFERENCES

(0)

(0)

로딩중