담화 갈래와 평가 주체에 따른 쓰기 평가의 상관 연구

A Correlation Research of The Writing assessment according to Discourse Genres and Assessment Subjects

본고는 일반고와 특목고 학습자들로 구성된 두 집단을 중심으로 교실수업 내 쓰기 평가의 신뢰도 향상과 쓰기 평가의 방안 마련을 위한 하나의 대안으로 쓰기 평가의 문제를 상관성의 측면에서 다루었다. 구체적으로 평가 주체와 담화 갈래 간의 평가 신뢰도가 상관관계 분석에 의해 검정되었다. 평가 주체는 학습자와 전문가로 구분되며, 전자는 자기, 동료, 모둠 평가에 후자는 전문가 평가에 참여하였다. 담화 갈래는 정보 전달, 설득, 친교 및 정서 표현으로 구분되었다. 두 가지 가설이 제기되었다. 첫째, '평가 주체 간 평가 결과에는 유의미한 상관관계가 있을 것이다'는 가설은 대상 학습자와 갈래에 따라 약간의 차이가 있었다. 둘째, '담화 갈래 간 평가 결과에는 유의미한 상관관계가 없을 것이다'는 가설은 평가 주체에 따라 정형화된 결과가 다르게 나왔다.

This paper treated the problem of reliability in writing assessment. There were focused on two small size of general and special highschool students. To this end, assessment subjects and discourse genres were divided. The former were self, peers, teams, and expert assessment. The latter were explanation, persuasion, and essays. It was the first hypothesis that had a significant correlation of between the assessment subjects. The result was obtained by a significant correlation between explanation and persuasion. Essay, however, except between some subjects, a significant correlation was not found. It was the second hypothesis that had not a significant correlation of between discourse genres. There was overall no significant correlation between discourse genres. But persuasion and essays were significant in the case of self assessment, and explanation was signifiant in the case of peer and teams assessment. This paper introduced correlation analysis in reliability of writing assessment. However, in order to solve the problem of reliability of the writing assessment, assessment group should be diversified and assessment standard subdivided. Also, the writing criteria should be constructed depending on the context of the writing, and the level of subjects.