新儒學, 張橫渠의 氣一元論과 李東垣의 內傷學說
Neo-confucianism(新儒學), Zhang Heng-qu(張橫渠)’s Qi-monism(氣一元論) and Li Dong-yuan(李東垣)’s Theory of Internal Injury(內傷學說)
- 대한한의학원전학회
- 대한한의학원전학회지
- 26권 3호
-
2013.0811 - 18 (7 pages)
- 44
Objective : This paper was designed to confirm the relation between Li Dong-yuan(李東垣)’s theory of internal injury(內傷學說) and Neo-confucianism(新儒學)’s academic orientation, particularly Zhang Heung-qu(張橫渠)’s ‘Qi-monism(氣一元論)’. Method : Through a comparative literature review, I searched for the commonality between Li Dong-yuan(李東垣)’s theory of internal injury(內傷學說) and Neo-confucianism(新儒學)’s academic orientation, particularly Zhang Heung-qu(張橫渠)’s ‘Qi-monism(氣一元論)’, and also examined the difference in the meaning of ‘Primordial Qi(元氣)’ in Qi-monism and that Lee Dong-yuan proposed. Result & Conclusion : The central theme of Neo-confucianism, ‘Staying on the Golden Path(允執厥中)’, has a commonality with Li Dong-yuan’s theory of internal injury that emphasized Primordial Qi, and the concepts of “Great Vacuity as Qi(太虛卽氣)”, “Two Properties Inherent in a Single Object(一物兩體)”, and “the Nature of Acquired Disposition(氣質之性)” have commonality with the concepts of “The Given from the Vacuity of Natural World(所受於天)”, Up & Down Movement(升降運動), and Yin Fire(陰火) of Primordial Qi in Li Dong-yuan’s theory of internal injury respectively. However, the concept of Primordial Qi in the Theory of Qi-monism refers to the building blocks of all things in the universe, whereas the concept of Primordial Qi that Li Dong-yuan proposed has no meaning of component of body but driving force that maintains the phenomenon of life.
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 李東垣의 內傷學說
Ⅲ. 李東垣의 內傷學說과 新儒學 및 張橫渠의 ‘氣一元論’과의 공통점
Ⅳ. 고찰
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
(0)
(0)