The paper tackles the educational point of fusion to confirm the authority of teachers. It has also examined the concept and types of‘fusion’, which can throw light on the paradigm of knowledge-based society. For seeking a solution to the so-called ‘risk of teacher’s authority’, the distinction between conceptions of fusion has been made so that we can establish the ‘tacit’ dimension of it, which has originated from Michael Polanyi. The bridge should be the authority that teacher actually exercise. However, we have seen that it is insufficient to draw a distinction between formal and substantive authorities. Thus the fusion based education, as the paper asserts, requires another conception such as ‘tentative authority’ tentatively. Under this conception, we can conclude that the fusion based education fulfills three prerequisites for the successful education, which are dubbed as logical order, openness and passion. There must exist the significant domain that the cognitive and the affective ones fused each other, which Richard Peters has named ‘compassion.’
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 융합교육의 개념과 유형
1. 융합의 개념
2. 수렴적 통합교육과 발산적 융합교육
3. 융합교육의 유형
Ⅲ. 권위
1. 형식적 권위
2. 실질적 권위
3. 잠정적 권위
Ⅳ. 융합교육의 조건
1. 논리적 질서
2. 개방성
3. 열정
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
(0)
(0)