상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
학술저널

검찰압수물사무규칙에 의한 지급정지의뢰제도의 문제점

Issues Arising from the Suspension of Payment Request System Under the Regulation on Confiscated Articles by the Prosecution Office

  • 127
122514.jpg

Currently, the Regulation on Confiscated Articles by the Prosecution Office, which is a decree of the Ministry of Justice and not a statute like the Criminal Procedure Code, provides internal standards for handling and conducting confiscation work by the Prosecution Office. The Regulation on Confiscated Articles by the Prosecution Office prescribes a suspension of payment request policy when a savings account passbook that is likely concealing criminal proceeds has been confiscated. Hence, such provision should be viewed as an infringement of the principle of statutory reservation with regards to property rights and restrictions thereof guaranteed by the Korean Constitution. Consequently, in order to achieve the criminal procedure goal of speedy and thorough seizure, as well as complete recovery of criminal proceeds through additional collection in accordance with due process of law, it would be desirable to codify seizure and additional collection without a warrant, which would be similar to the "confiscation without a warrant policy" stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Code.

Ⅰ. 검토 필요성

Ⅱ. 논점과 관련된 사례의 구성

Ⅲ. 범죄수익의 몰수ㆍ추징 등에 관한 관련 법률 규정

Ⅳ. 검사의 금융기관에 대한 지급정지의뢰 및 금융기관의 지급정지로 인한 문제점

Ⅴ. 형사소송법상 법원의 몰수ㆍ추징 보전명령 전 수사기관에 의한 긴급몰수보전처분에 관한 근거규정 신설 필요성

Ⅵ. 사례의 검토

Ⅶ. 맺음말

참고문헌

(0)

(0)

로딩중