역사적 문화자산의 보존과 부동산개발사업의 상생방안 모색

A Study on the coexistence between Preservation of Historical-Cultural Properties and Development of Real Estate

Internationally, it is widely encouraged to restore and preserve the cultural properties and historic heritages, because of their economic impact. However, when the archaelological heritages are discovered during the real estate developmental project, it confronts huge difficulties, such as suspension of project and financial support for excavation. Likewise, archaeological heritages has been considered as the obstacles of developmental projects. However, this research find out that there are further possibilities of coexistence-measures between archaeological heritages and developmental projects. The results are as in the following. 1. This study examinate and clarified the practical meaning of terminologies, including restoration, preservation, and repair, which were the main confusions on the study about preservations of historic buildings and archaeological heritages. To be more specific, it is necessary to clarify the terminology, because in Construction Law, relocation means moving the position of buildings in the same site of developemnt, whereas in the Cultural Properties Law, relocation includes broader range of sites. 2. It is unevitable to undertake excavation of preservation of cultural properties when the buried cultural property found during development project. On the other hand, the properties‘ practical application plan has not been discussed a lot. For example, the buried cultural properties covered in this study, such as New cropolis Museum, Xanten Museum, and Yukuijeon Museum would be the typical cases of preservation and evelopment. While preceding project, discovering the properties can be the obstacles, but it also emphasize the importance of seeking coexistence-measures through various case inquiries. 3. This study also suggested combination patterns over practical preservation of cultural historic properties. In terms of preservation, it is divided into place, condition, and type. On the other hand, in terms of Practical usage, it suggested compound between preservation and application by specifying into extension of size and alteration of use. In particular, the case of Johanneum Museum would be the great example of practical usage of application, using underground space by preserving historic condition.