한국과 몽골의 부패원인과 특성에 관한 연구

A Study on the Causes and Characters of Corruption in Korea and Mongolia

The purpose of this study is to analyze the causes and characters of corruption through reviewing related previous researchers and examining the current state of public corruption in Korea and Mongolia, ultimately providing political suggestions for anti-corruption. For the purpose, this researcher first used the Corruption Perception Index(CPI) and a survey of the Global Corruption Barometer , both of which were issued by the Transparency International(TI), as the sources of information about corruption in the public sector. The researcher also got such information from the Global Corruption Index and the institutional factors of corruption all of which were released by the World Economic Forum(WEF). In determining the factors of corruption in Korea's public sector, the researcher reviewed a public integrity survey conducted by the Anti-Corruption & Civil Rights Commission and a survey of corruption trends by the Korea Institute of Public Administration. To identify the factors of public corruption in Mongolia, then, this study referred to the Mongolia Corruption Benchmarking Survey which had been conducted by the Asia Foundation. Based on the findings of the study, this researcher would makes the following suggestions how to remove corruption from the public sectors of Korea and Mongolia. First, the standards of punishment against corrupted public officials and the disciplines of public service should be strengthened as the fact that the public awareness of corruption itself is severely distorted should be considered. Second, the Anti-Corruption & Civil Rights Commission of Korea and IAAC of Mongolia should be legally and systematically improved and supplemented into independent anti-corruption organizations, respectively. Third, social environments friendly to anti-corruption should be formed to eradicate social customs and practices that tolerate bribery and corruption. In association, it's need to promote the development of civil society through political democratization and raise the transparency of political elites. And finally, civil groups should intensify their role as a coordinator and critic under mutually organic partnerships.