초록
According to Article 366 of Korea’s Criminal Act, anyone who reduces the utility of another person’s documents by concealing them is punished for the crime of destruction and damage. The German Penal Code stipulates the concealment of documents as a type of the crime of forgery (Article 274 No. 1). In contrast, the Penal Code of Japan punishes the same act as a crime of destruction and damage by interpretation although there is no clear stipulation (Articles 258 and 261). Because the Korean Criminal Act stipulates that the concealment of documents constitutes a crime of destruction and damage, it can be seen as closely related to the Penal Code of Japan. The present study sought to seek the origins of the stipulation of the concealment of documents as a crime of destruction and damage by tracing the process of revising the Penal Code of Japan. In 1880, the Penal Code of Japan stipulated the damaging of documents in a chapter on the “Crimes of Counterfeiting of Documents” and another one on the “Crimes of Destruction and Damage,” respectively. In contrast, the Penal Code of Japan of 1907 transferred the damaging of documents to a chapter on the “Crimes of Destruction and Damage.” However, the Supreme Court of Judicature of Japan has ruled from the past that the crime of destruction and damage can be established in the case of the violation of the utility of things even without direct damage to them. In addition, from a similar perspective, the Supreme Court of Judicature of Japan has stated that the concealment of government documents, too, constitutes a crime of damaging government documents. On the other hand, prevalent views in Japan likewise have supported this opinion. Accommodating such judicial precedents and prevalent views, the revision draft of the Japanese penal code of 1940 stipulated the crime of destruction and damage as the act of “destroying or damaging another’s property, and consequently injuring its utility.” The Korean Criminal Act can be seen as having inherited this. When such a process is examined, the following facts become apparent. First, “concealment” in the crime of destruction and damage is related to the “dispossession of things” in German criminal jurisprudence. Consequently, in interpreting “concealment,” it is necessary to examine related discussions. Second, such a legislative form ultimately seems to originate from the opinion that the intention of illegal acquisition is necessary to establish property crimes. In other words, the intention of illegal acquisition can be said not to stop on a theoretical level but to have been turned into positive law, albeit indirectly.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 문서의 위조에서 훼기의 분리 - 1880년 일본형법과 1907년 일본형법
Ⅲ. 1907년 일본형법의 「훼기, 손괴, 상해」에 대한 확장해석
Ⅳ. 문서의 은닉에 대한 일본 판례의 경향과 그에 대한 평가
Ⅴ. 「은닉」의 명문화 - 개정형법가안의 확장된 손괴죄
Ⅵ. 문서의 「은닉」이 가지는 의미
Ⅶ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
등록된 참고문헌 정보가 없습니다.
해당 권호 수록 논문 (11)
- 연명의료중단의 형법이론적 근거
- 정보절도범죄에 관한 실효적 대응방안 -특히 2015년 일본 부정경쟁방지법 개정법의 내용을 중심으로-
- 아동학대의 원인, 그리고 대책 마련을 위한 연구의 필요성 -심리학적 관점에서-
- 깨진 유리창 이론에 대한 고찰
- 이른바 ‘연명의료결정’법의 형사정책적인 의문
- 성범죄자 신상정보 등록・관리제도의 문제점과 개선방안
- 손괴죄에서의 「은닉」에 대한 고찰 -문서의 경우를 중심으로-
- 비속범죄로서 아동학대의 현황과 과제
- 불법사행산업 단속의 주체
- 국민참여재판에서 배심원후보자 기피신청절차 개선방안 연구
- 대마사용의 가벌성에 관한 비판적 검토 -독일사례를 중심으로-
추천 논문
-
공동주택 층간소음의 환경분쟁 조정사례선택없음함진식 한국주거환경학회 한국주거환경학회 학술대회 발표논문집 2005년 학술심포지움 2005.04
-
양형우(Yang Hyung-Woo) 한국재산법학회 재산법연구 財産法硏究 第31卷 第1號 2014.03
-
김재현(Kim Jae Hyun), 강휘진(Kang Hwi Jin) 한국방재안전학회 한국방재안전학회 학술대회 논문집 2019년 학술대회 발표집 2019.11
-
이은영, 송욱진, 배명진 인문사회과학기술융합학회 예술인문사회융합멀티미디어논문지 6권 12호 2016.12
-
안종석 한국주택협회 주택과사람들 Serial No.190 2006.01