유럽 기본권보호에 있어서 독일 연방헌법재판소의 견해

Opinions of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany in the Protection of European Fundamental Rights

Germany joined the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights (ECHR) and signed the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CRF). Nevertheless, the German Federal Constitutional Court has ruled that the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CRF) has only a limited meaning. The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany distinguishes between the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights (ECHR) and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CRF). The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany has different criteria for the examination of constitutional review between the fundamental rights of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights (ECHR) and the fundamental rights of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CRF). The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany has ruled that the use of the principle of prohibition of arbitrators on the basis of judgments that the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany has the ultimate obligation to supervise the observance of the international legal obligations of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights (ECHR). The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany declares that the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CRF) has an advantage over the German legal system. However, in order to solve the conflict between the German fundamental rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CRF), the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany should propose a fundamental method. If the scope of the protection of the German fundamental rights exceeds the fundamental rights of the European Union, there will be no problem because it does not cause conflicts with the task of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CRF). However, if the fundamental rights of the European Union are guaranteed more comprehensive protection than the German fundamental rights, or are subject to profits between different fundamental rights in pluralistic fundamental rights, it will lead to serious conflicts. It would be best to interpret the German fundamental rights in line with the fundamental rights of the EU. In case of conflict between the two fundamental rights, the fundamental rights of the EU should be applied rather than the German fundamental rights.