정당한 보상으로서의 생활보상에 관한 비교법적 고찰

A review Comparative law on the living compensation as a just compensation

Taking must be accompanied by just compensation for the typical infringement of property by national authority. However, there is a continuing debate over the criteria and extent of compensation, content, content, etc. in relation to compensation. The loss of compensation is based on the possibility of continuing to live the life of the previous life, but it is often difficult to live a life or even threaten a living base. This causes many social and economic problems. Accordingly, it is inevitable to consider guaranteeing the guarantee of tenure as well as guaranteeing protection of tenure in order to protect the livelihood of the means of living. Living compensation should compensate for the damages incurred by the public and compensate for the damages incurred the public utility work, such as providing compensation for the provision of a special sacrifice to the public, such as providing incentives for job support, such as providing compensation for the provision of a job, living expenses, living rewards. This is a matter of living compensation and problem. In particular, the regulations on compensation for compensation in the country s land compensation law should be limited to a limited extent in comparison to other nations In this study, the Commission proposed a measure of compensation for compensation based on the principle of compensation and compensation for living compensation by the Korea and other nations.