Image Evaluation and Exposure Dose with the Application of Tube Voltage and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction of Low Dose Computed Tomography

저 선량 흉부 전산화단층촬영(low dose computed tomography; LDCT)검사 시 기존의 검사방법인 필터보정역투영법인 FBP(filted back projection)와 적응식 통계적 반복 재구성법인 ASIR(adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction)의 적용 및 관전압 변화에 따른 영상의 화질과 피폭선량을 비교 평가해 보고자 하였다. 흉부 phantom을 이용하여 재구성방법에 따라 FBP와 ASIR적용(10%, 20%)을 하였고, 관전압(100kVp, 120kVp)에 변화를 주어 실험을 하였다. 화질평가를 위해 back-ground noise와 signal-noise ratio(SNR), contrast-noise ratio(CNR)를 구하였으며, 선량평가를 위해 CTDIvol과 DLP를 구하였다. 화질평가에 있어 kVp에 따른 ascending aorta(AA) SNR과 inpraspinatus muscle(IM) SNR은 AA SNR과 IM SNR은 유의한 차이가 있었다(p < 0.05). 선량평가에 있어 CTDIvol과 DLP는 유의한 차이가 있었으며(p<0.05), CTDIvol은 120 kVp, FBP가 2.6 mGy, 120 kVp, 10%-ASIR가 2.38 mGy, 120kVp, 20%-ASIR가 2.17 mGy로 0.43 mGy 감소하였고, 100 kVp, FBP가 1.61 mGy, 100 kVp, 10%-ASIR가 1.48 mGy, 100 kVp, 20%-ASIR가 1.34 mGy로 0.27 mGy 감소하였다. 또한 DLP에서는 120 kVp, FBP가 103.21 mGy·cm, 120 kVp, 10%-ASIR가 94.57 mGy·cm, 120 kVp, 20%-ASIR가 85.94 mGy·cm로 17.27 mGy·cm(16.7%) 감소하였고, 100 kVp, FBP가 63.87 mGy·cm, 100 kVp, 10%-ASIR가 58.54 mGy·cm, 100 kVp, 20%-ASIR가 53.25 mGy·cm로 10.62 mGy·cm(16.7%)로 감소하였다. 재구성방법에 따른 FBP와 ASIR 10%, 20%에서는 화질의 변화 없이 선량을 줄일 수 있어 흉부 low dose CT검사 시 ASIR 20%적용하여 검사하는 것이 좋으며, 관전압 변화에 따른 120 kVp와 100 kVp에서는 선량은 크게 줄어들었지만, noise가 증가하여 화질이 떨어지는 것으로 나타났다.

The study has attempted to evaluate and compare the image evaluation and exposure dose by respectively applying filter back projection (FBP), the existing test method, and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) with different values of tube voltage during the low dose computed tomography (LDCT). With the image reconstruction method as basis, chest phantom was utilized with the FBP and ASIR set at 10%, 20% respectively, and the change of tube voltage (100 kVp, 120 kVp). For image evaluation, back ground noise, signal- noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-noise ratio (CNR) were measured, and, for dose assessment, CTDIvol and DLP were measured respectively. In terms of image evaluation, there was significant difference in ascending aorta (AA) SNR and inpraspinatus muscle (IM) SNR with the different amount of tube voltage (p < 0.05). In terms of CTDIvol, the measured values with the same tube voltage of 120 kVp were 2.6 mGy with no-ASIR and 2.17 mGy with 20%-ASIR respectively, decreased by 0.43 mGy, and the values with 100 kVp were 1.61 mGy with no-ASIR and 1.34 mGy with 20%-ASIR, decreased by 0.27 mGy. In terms of DLP, the measured values with 120 kVp were 103.21 mGy·cm with no-ASIR and 85.94 mGy·cm with 20%-ASIR, decreased by 17.27 mGy·cm (about 16.7%), and the values with 100 kVp were 63.84 mGy·cm with no-ASIR and 53.25 mGy·cm with 20%-ASIR, a decrease by 10.62 mGy·cm ( about 16.7%). A t lower tube v oltage, the r ate of d ose significantly decreased, but the negative effects on image evaluation was shown due to the increase of noise.