The US-Korea Free Trade Agreement (also known as KORUS FTA) is a trade agreement between the United States and the Republic of Korea. Negotiations were announced on February 2, 2006 and were concluded on April 1, 2007. The successful completion of the agreement was announced on June 30, 2007. As a result of the KORUS FTA, the scope of protection of copyright will be expanded to include the protection of temporary storage, additional 70 years of protection, etc. Also, the protection mechanism for an owner of copyright will be greatly enhanced so as to abolish the provision of victims complaint and allow the prosecution by the direct investigation power with respect to the copyright infringement. Such protection policy of copyright will start if the agreement proposal is ratified and a revised bill of the Copyright Act is soon passed in the parliament. First of all, I insist that the spirit of our constitution should be considered in the discussion of the copyright problem. Article 22, Paragraph 2 of our constitution regulating the academic and artistic freedom provides that the rights of an author, an inventor, a scientist and an artist shall be protected by laws. Also, the preamble of our constitution declares the idea of a cultural race, and Article 9 of the constitution imposes an obligation to the succession and development of traditional culture and promotes national culture of our nation to realize the cultural idea of our race. The government has an obligation to develop culture by protecting authors according to such spirit of the constitution. The Copyright law is one of the most important legal systems in the Information Age. The policy of emphasizing the protection of copyright is an indispensable measure due to the trend that the information and culture are developed through the Internet simultaneously throughout the world. On the other hand, when looking into the Internet culture of today, open culture through creation and sharing like Web 2.0 is spreading day by day. As the Internet becomes a part of our lives, numerous literary works float through the cyber space and are recreated (remixed) in various forms, thus making the scope or limitation of the protection of the copyright vague. The problem is that the Internet has not been created originally on the premise of permission. In order to obtain permission for the usage of a literary work, one should contact the author which needs considerable time and cost. Also in many cases, even though they want his/her work to be used by many people, the authors are worried giving unlimited permission of the copy. In such circumstances of legal conflicts, one is likely to violate the Copyright Act more often than the traffic regulations. Therefore, I will briefly present my opinion regarding the optimal balance between the protection of copyright and the guarantee of users benefit after the KORUS FTA ratification. The problem of illegal copying is most serious in the Internet society, especially in the field of the movie and music industry sector. The main principle of protecting an owner of copyright is mostly secured in the Internet. However, there is still a tendency of tolerating the illegal copy to a certain degree in actual life of using the Internet, and thus there are frequent cases where authors take legal procedures against a horde of users who made illegal downloads. If the tendency of not paying a price is established, there will be hardly any commercial success in a field in which a large amount of personnel and capital are required, such as the movie industry. If there is no commercial success, the entire business will be depressed and the creative activities of literary works will be deteriorated as a result. Therefore, the government-wide cooperation is necessary for the industrial development and activated utilization of the copyright. Therefore, a consensus is made on the fact that the copyright infringement without permission should be
l. 서론
ll. 한미 FTA협정 중 저작권 관련조항
lll. 한미 FTA 이후 바람직한 저작권정책 방향
lV. 결론
(0)
(0)