This paper examines the newly revised ICC Arbitration Rules which were enforced as of the 1st of March 2017. To this end, innovative changes in these rules reflecting policy development and practice with a view to increase time and cost efficiency and transparency are scrutinized and analyzed after which the newly adopted provisions for expedited procedures aimed at having the final award issued by a sole arbitrator within 6 months after the case management conference are presented. A comparative analysis on the provisions for expedited procedures among the ICC, ICDR, SIAC, and KCAB rules is then conducted where some major issues that may generate due process challenges by dissatisfied parties to the arbitration are discussed. Some implications from the possibility of due process challenges are offered and a couple of practical tips for trade or legal practitioners on what to consider in implementing the newly revised ICC Rules in the future are suggested.
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 2017 ICC 개정 중재규칙의 주요내용 개관
Ⅲ. ICC 개정규칙 신속절차 규정의 주요 내용과 쟁점
Ⅳ. ICC 신속절차와 주요 중재기관 규정과의 비교·분석 및 유의사항
Ⅳ. 결론
(0)
(0)