This Study attempts to explain why more wheat elevators were not becoming early adopters by paying quality-adjusted prices. Since inconsistencies have been observed between expected utility and individuals` behavior, this research considers the case where producers` preferences can be more appropriately modeled by prospect theory, and whether such preferences can explain more of elevators` reluctance to pay quality-adjusted prices. A simulation model is used to measure the effects of risk-averse producers (in both expected utility and prospect theory frameworks) and limited quality information on profits that can be earned by an elevator that pays quality-adjusted prices. Results indicate that prospect theory helps to explain part, but not all, of the reluctance to pay quality-adjusted prices.
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Conceptual Framework
Ⅲ. Results
Ⅳ. Conclusions
References
(0)
(0)