학술저널
This paper proposes a new explanation of the well‐known that‐t effect, based on the assumption that the head‐head relation is a matter of PF rather than of syntax. After critical review of some Minimalist approaches (Roussou 2002, Roberts and Roussou 2001, Pesetsky and Torrego 2001, 2002), a PF‐based solution is proposed in terms of a generalization on the lexical realization of heads. In particular, this paper argues that the first head that is compatible with agreement must lexically host the Agr‐feature of T on a phase basis. This solution turns out to be applicable to various data regarding the that‐t effects across languages.
1. Introduction
2. Syntactic Approaches
3. Solution
4. Conclusion
(0)
(0)