학술저널
In vol. 5 of this journal, Zev Handel commented negatively on claims of John DeFrancis and the author about the notion of logogram. The author defended those claims in vol. 6, eliciting a lengthy surrejoinder from Handel in vol. 7. This article continues the discussion, emphasizing the need to avoid the circularity of saying that logograms are graphic units of logographic writing systems, and the context-sensitive nature of how graphic units represent chunks of language.
Definitions
Sinocentric Exceptionalism
Conclusion
(0)
(0)