연안정비사업 선정의 타당성 평가체계와 개선방향

Assessment Process for the Coastal Maintenance Project and Improvement Directions

In this study, we dealt with the process of establishing more objective and scientific evaluation system to select coastal maintenance projects. The maintenance project evaluation system consists of an indicator evaluation, an on-site evaluation, and an expert evaluation. In order to maximize the merits of the individual evaluation stage and to supplement the limitations, a three-step evaluation system was adopted. In order to integrate the evaluation scores for each evaluation stage, the multi - attribute utility theory, which is one of the multi-criteria decision methodologies, was applied to derive the evaluation weights. In addition, this study examined the public interest and the need for policy through the survey of public awareness. In the case of policy makers, experts judged that business is important in terms of urgency, fitness for particular purpose, and appropriateness of project contents. However, citizens who are beneficiaries of the project judged that the appropriateness of project contents is most important. In addition, we reviewed the recent progress of the post - management system after the coastal maintenance project and discussed the issues to be considered when establishing the coastal maintenance plan. In the long term, it is necessary to link up post - management system with evaluation systems when establishing the next maintenance project.