상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
학술저널

창작 로봇 제작 및 프로그래밍 활동에서 창의성 동질 및 이질 팀 구성에 따른 팀 상호작용 분석

Analysis on Interactions of Creativity Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Team in Creative Robot Making and Programming Activities

  • 23
138929.jpg

The purpose of this research is to examine the characteristics of team interaction according to the creativity of team members. Research subjects to achieve this purpose included 28 students who are in engineering education in the College of Education at A University in Daejeon and have taken robot-related courses. Through first and second MBTI, and TTCT tests, the final homogeneous and heterogeneous teams were formed, and an experimental study was conducted by developing team design activity assignment. The major research results were as follows. In terms of a comprehensive view on interaction frequency, both homogeneous team and heterogeneous team suggested had the highest frequency in suggesting opinions. However, each of the team members in the homogeneous team had different communication frequency among each other while each team member in the heterogeneous team had almost similar frequency. A microscopic analysis of the communication process of homogeneous team showed that the team members’ roles were divided among each other in communication. Next, according to the microscopic analysis of the heterogeneous team’s communication process, the team members exchanged opinions in the beginning, talked to themselves in words that were hard to understand the meanings, and they stopped having conversations in the end. Due to such decrease in communication, two team members could not solve the confusing state of being unable to understand each other’s opinions and failed to complete their assignments. The microscopic analysis demonstrated that the homogeneous team had a smooth interaction, because when one team member suggested an opinion during a conversation, other team members agreed with it through a discussion. However, the members in the heterogeneous team experienced confusion as they could not understand each other’s conversation and could not overcome this problem, leading to lack of conversations.

I. 서 론

II. 이론적 배경

Ⅲ. 연구의 방법

IV. 연구 결과

V. 결론 및 제언

(0)

(0)

로딩중