간주관적 웰빙(Intersubjective Wellbeing) 개념을 접목한 지역 커뮤니티웰빙 지표의 중요도 분석

Analysis of the Importance of Community Well-being Index Grafted onto Intersubjective Well-being

Perceiving that community well-being is composed of the two aspects of individuals and agencies, this research attempted to perform an evaluation of the factors and indices considering these two aspects. As asserted by Amanda (2012), this researcher judged that the simultaneous consideration of individuals and agencies can include evaluations of individuals’ inner psychology and external state. As for the evaluation of the external state, the concept of intersubjective well-being was utilized. As a result of the analysis based on this, some implications could be derived. First, the results of the analysis of all the indices were positive with regard to the diverse external factors of community well-being but were negative with regard to the impairment of nature and economic life to maintain a living. Second, the results of the analysis of the factor levels show that the community well-being domain that is perceived to need to be most urgently resolved is economic capital, followed by natural, cultural, and infrastructure capital (in descending order of urgency).Finally, the results of the analysis of all the indices by region show that the most important policy project in Gangnam-gu is that involving the resolution of the air pollution problem. In Guro-gu and Jungu, resolving the air pollution issue was also the top-priority policy project. In Dongdaemun-gu, budget operation was perceived to be the most important issue. As for Mapo-gu and Jongro-gu, unemployed support policy was perceived as the top-priority policy project. The indices that were perceived to be the most important (within the 1st to 5th places in ranking) in the six subject regions were air pollution, job training service, unemployed support policy, paid tax appropriateness, and regional living expenses.