This study proposes the objectification of 138 indicators that assess the countermeasures of Seoul city’s fire service organization after a disaster, in order to allow fire service organization to serve as an emergency rescue agency. First of all, this paper summarized Seoul city’s disaster countermeasure cases and inductively derived core factors considered important, examined them by matching with evaluation indexes, and analyzed the reliability and validity of 138 items among 6 fields of emergency recsure activity evaluation indexes. As a result, it has been verified that 17 factors(65.3%) are not reflected in evaluation indexes among 26 core factors in disaster countermeasure, and among 138 valuation criteria, 20 of them (14.5%) have low validity and 54 of them (39.1%) are difficult to be objectified. Through the process above, 7 implications were derived, which are exclusion of preliminary evaluation indexes, prescription of the roles of related organizations, defining the scale of evaluation, sublating vague terminology, considering the type and stage of disaster countermeasure, simplification and reclassification of additional issues.
I. 서 론
Ⅱ. 이론적 논의와 분석 틀
Ⅲ. 긴급구조 대응활동 평가기준의 적합성 분석
Ⅳ. 긴급구조 대응활동 평가지표의 개선방안 모색
Ⅴ. 결 론
(0)
(0)