This paper explores an intersection of two central issues of Generative Grammar, ellipsis and anaphora. Specifically, I focus on fragments of self -pronouns, i.e. short responses constituted by single self -pronouns, and argue that they give a piece of evidence for the direct-generation analysis of fragments, in which fragments are not derived from underlying full sentences but directly generated as what they are. I demonstrate that self -pronouns are much less restricted in fragments than in sentences, showing cases of fragments of self -pronouns whose sentential counterparts are ungrammatical for violation of Binding Condition A. Then, Binding Theory as well as the deletion analysis of fragments are challenged. The fact indicates that self -pronouns are all logophors or logophoric anaphoras when they are fragments. This is predicted by Reinhart and Reuland’s (1993) generalization that self -pronouns are anaphors only when they are arguments of syntactic predicates. The requirement is not fulfilled in fragments, if they have no covert sentential structures.
1. Introduction
2. Sentence Fragments
3. Binding Theory and its Failure
4. More on Logophoricity
5. Fragments of Self-Pronouns
6. Conclusion