상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
146478.jpg
KCI등재 학술저널

잭슨데모크라시 여전히 유효한가?

Andrew Jackson and Historians

  • 24

Recently historiography about “Age of Jackson” mainly focused at social and cultural developments. Specially so-called social history and its effects dominate all the historical research outputs in this historical area. But Political history as traditional main field of history has not lost its importance and, futhermore, its vital reason to remain and maintain in the historical researching fields is much more required than any other one. Even though recently social history findings have the limelight, but the much more we know about these social new facts at that time, the much more we could understand and should be obliged to study main central high politics. Because all the different historical new facts are indulged and involved into the main high politics and the deeply interconnected central political people such as Andrew Jackson, central figures and their political programs are much importance than any other minor historical findings in the part of social and cultural approaches. And so, now we required traditional political history should be revival.

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 전통적인 개념의 탄생과 반발

Ⅲ. “잭슨민주주의” 여전히 유효하다

Ⅳ. 결론

로딩중